Títina, the Archaic Lilitic alphabet
When alternative ways to represent the same sound exist, words generally adopt a preference for one form over the other in a given position, usually putting the largest letters toward the middle of the word. Generally, the alternate forms (such as the second form of "a") are invoked to break up a pattern caused by repetitions of the more common forms.
See this dictionary category for the names of the letters themselves, and this one for the punctuation marks.
A full pronunciation chart for the orthography can be found at Traditional Phonology and Orthography, later in this article.
Litzína Sarthin, Sarthían minuscule
Language and writing co-evolved among the Lilitai, often in non-linear ways. As the ceremonial distinction between Archaic and Classical Lilitika evolved, so too did modes of writing. Sarthían minuscule was one of the more recognisable forms of Títina, endorsed by Reséa Chúkotía around the time that Sarasí became the dominant template for argolects of the fleet. It is rare in inscriptions from the first Illeran colony, but is found in a white range of documents, graffiti, and personal engravings.
Illerikhai Talmotan, symbols of the quick aesthete
This writing system developed late in the Ketalán period and is often compared to the Arabic abjad; although vowels are represented in the main track (with a minimal 'vowel carrier' glyph), they are predominantly defined by diacritics, and can be omitted if the result is unambiguous. Usage of Talmota carried on into the Thessian period, and it has been sporadically used for modern Lilitic.
Illerikhai Tallamanis, Sarthían ideograms and ligatures
Certain Litzína Sarthin writings include tachygraphic inventions such as those above. These most likely originated as abbreviations and ligatures, but are tied to distinct semantics, e.g. the glyph for the FPIC particle 'il' cannot be interchanged with the glyph for the verb stem 'il-'.
Traditional Phonology and Orthography
|eː or ei||é||é||bait|
|ɑ or ɒ||ô||ɒ||paw|
|øː or yː||ê||ə||deux or über|
|x or χ||kh||χ||loch|
|χ||x (or kh)||χ||Achmed|
|ʁ||qr (or gh)||γ||Paris|
|ɹ, ɻ, ɽ or r||r||r||real|
|t or t̪||t||t||tip|
|d or d̪||d||d||dip|
|ɾ or r||dt||ɾ||water|
*in conservative dialects only; distinct from row
In addition, a voiceless glottal stop [ʔ] may be inserted under certain circumstances, especially in interjections. Interjections often sequester uncommon sounds; in particular the codas of words ending in the <é> sound degenerate to <ê> sounds.
Allophony and Dialectical History
The phonology in Lilitika changed slowly, much like the semantics of the language, over the thousand years during which the Lilitai drifted in space.
The vowel modifiers, h, i, n/m/ñ, and r/ʳ, aspirate, ioticize, nasalize and rhoticize vowels, respectively.
n is fully redundant to the writing system's expressiveness, but may still be favoured explicitly as part of the proper spelling of a word. Note that n does not indicate /n/, but only nasalisation; this is dependent on the environment and may alternatively be realized as /m/ or /ŋ/. More precise representations such as ñ or m (not to be confused with n and m) may be used if this is unclear. Any vowels with tildes can be interpreted as nazalisation, e.g. sãpo. n rarely appears unless adjacent to a plosive, so the correct interpretation is generally obvious.
r has mild phonological use: it ensures an /ɹ/ or r-coloured reading, and discourages an /ɻ/ reading.
The diphthong ei is generally realized as [ei] and replaced with <é> in roots; ui is never (or at least only very rarely) used in Lilitic phonotactically, so only oi and ai are found frequently in the dictionary. Note that <ei> is preserved in particular by forms derived from eneí, though it is still pronounced /ɛne:/.
Tenseness and Vowel Strength
Many vowels in Lilitika habitually change form when incorporated into compounds and are recognized by speakers according to a tense-lax contrast. This is reflected in the standard orthography by the use of acute accents; <í>, <é>, and <ú> are the tense forms of <i>, <e>, and <u>, a pattern no doubt familiar to English speakers. In Illeran, this is supplemented by <ô> (/ɑ/) becoming the lax form of <a> in certain case endings. <ê>, <û>, <o>, and pre-Illeran <ô> and <a> do not participate in this behaviour; the orthographic forms of <ê>, <û>, and <ô> represent reconstructed Oksirapho phonology.
The vowels <o>, <é>, <ê>, <í>, <ú>, and <û> are considered the 'strong' vowels, and take priority in placing word stress. The diphthongs ai, oi, and au ([aʊ]) also behave as strong. <a> and <e> are considered weak, with <i> and <ô> considered "very" weak. When a small number of strong vowels is present in a word, stress falls on the last strong vowel.
Lilitika uses a combination of length and stress accent; in addition to major stress falling on one syllable per word, it is also common for stressed vowels to be slightly lengthened as well, even if they are defined as having a long quantity already. Similarly, unstressed long vowels may be shortened if they neighbour a stressed long vowel.
Words with no strong vowels, such as sifa (first person pronoun nominative feminine), alanekal (down destination neuter) or viris (deep past to be), usually adopt stress on the first vowel in the final inflectional ending, causing strengthening in the cases of i, ô, and e into í, o, and é respectively: [s̪ɪf·a] -> [ˈs̪iː·fa], [a·la·nɛk·al] -> [a·lan·ˈeiː·kal], [vɪ·rɪs̪] -> ['viː·ris̪]. This pattern is not always followed, and in particular it is avoided when a distinction between the vocative and nominative is important. The function of this is to clarify morpheme boundaries.
Words with two or more strong vowels in a row (e.g. kotopu) usually resort to placing stress as close as possible to the second-last vowel in the word, consistent with middle-clustering of ornately-written consonant forms: kŏtōpĕ́, kŏtōpǎ, ǎlĕ́ōnǎ ([alɛi·ˈona]), Dŏᵢssḗᵢǎ, ĕkhǎlthĕ́ōnĕ́ (possibly with a secondary stress on the ǎ to break things up), and so on.
Lilitika is often spoken with heavy use of contractions, which are preserved when it is recorded for the sake of verse. Intermediate syllables are the most commonly elided for this purpose, although sometimes the shape of a word may suggest deleting only part of it, or part of a run of vowels. Contractions are usually realised as silent, although they are occasionally realized as an unwritten glottal stop or brief pause if doing so does not disrupt a syllable.
Plé'vai 'l poluw'as vis = [lai] pléovai il poluwías vis = they are the days of joy. poluw'as in this case was contracted to fit a metre; the í is deleted because poluwas can only be formed from contracting poluwías and does not otherwise occur in the lexicon. Casual speech might see the word further contracted, to p'luw'as or (more likely) pol'was and eventually pol'as. This convention of middle-syllable reduction is responsible for the heavy contribution of blending to the production of new vocabulary. Grammatically, note that FPIC rules permit a nominative noun provided in a construct to also be the subject of the sentence, so technically "lai" is unnecessary.
Vowel collisions between words
The possession particle il ("of") in particular is frequently abbreviated to 'l following noun forms ending in vowels. Indeed, weaker vowels are frequently abbreviated as a matter of course whenever such collisions occur. Matched vowels are usually resolved by eliding the second instance of the vowel, e.g. "saní 'ora" for "saní íora."
When there is no clear way to balance two vowels, such as the collision of two strong vowels, then the second vowel may be aspirated: "saní olrú" thus becomes "saní holrú." Some Venrafíai insert a nasal consonant instead. Depending on the author, either insertion may go unwritten and be only detectable when spoken. In addition, vowels may be elided anyway (usually the later vowel) and, in careful language, aspiration or a nasal consonant may be inserted even between weak vowels in order to be extremely clear.
Vowel collisions within a word
Contraction is mandatory if the stem of a word matches its inflected ending: otherwise, if a noun such as indúnou is declined in the masculine, it becomes the unpleasant "indúnoö." The Lilitai almost always elide double vowels in such cases to a single vowel. This is represented by an apostrophe, typically deleting the first vowel: indún'o. Such situations are rare, and mostly occur with masculine forms being used with nouns that the Lilitai habitually considered feminine, such as a moon (akoa) or musical instrument (sinoa).
An exception to this scheme of synaeresis is when two very weak vowels meet: i + i = í and ô + ô = o, although e + e = e. Similarly, tense vowels overpower their lax counterparts: í + i = í, ô + o = o, e + é = é, u + ú = ú. Dissimilar vowels merge irregularly according to the environment, the availability of a suitable diphthong, or simply speaker preference.
These forms are more common when combining morphemes to create a compound word. When applying a suffix, however, they are usually not found: amé + ekíu = amekíu. Many suffixes start with weakened versions of root vowels (i, e, u) that hint at the original root, but not all (e.g. ireshkí, which derives from an inflected verb.)
As a general rule, suffixes should be applied to the stem (with the final ending removed) rather than the dictionary form of the root, although exceptions may be made in order to preserve e.g. a critical gender marker. Alegharí is one example of a word that defies convention, although it was later replaced with aleghurí.
The major diphthongs in Lilitika are [ai], [ei], [ɔi], and /aʊ/. These are almost always stressed, and are created by the phoneme combinations <ai>, <ei>, <oi>, and <au>, respectively. The diphthongs <ai>, <ei>, and <oi> may also be created with a long <í>, especially in the termini of adjectives, e.g. noseí is pronounced ['noʊ·'s̪eiː].
Some diphthongs may be avoided in the final syllable for pronunciation or ambiguity reasons, e.g. ithaé becomes <ithaïs> (to avoid conflicting with -ais, the subject feminine plural complement, which is used frequently), and /ithaïr/ (because [aiʳ] is illegal), but the Lilitai have no problems with <ithairis>, because it comes out as [ɪθ·'ai·ɻɪs̪]. The primary trend is that iotacized vowels cannot be r-coloured as well.
Punctuation is mostly straightforward. The Lilitika quotation marks, full-stop/period, comma, question mark, exclamation mark, and hyphen behave familiarly, but the imperative mark, punctus, and semicolon may be somewhat alien to the reader.
The imperative mark is used following sentences in the interrogative case, just as the question mark follows those in the interrogative case.
The punctus indicates a pause in speech and has no grammatical meaning (like the mediaeval Latin one), but can take on the meaning of the em dash or comma in English, and may be used as the colon at the beginning of a list of nouns.
The semicolon is a more powerful counterpart, and is actually a 'sentence weld' which is weaker than a period but requires that both sides be full sentences or intentional fragments. It can also serve as a colon when giving a single example (this is what I mean: a sentence prompting for an explanation) or a list of elements which are sentences and not merely noun clauses, naked verbs, or adjectives/adverbs. For example:
This sentence is structurally "I want you (to feed && to clothe && to shelter) these people."
The commas here would also be Lilitic commas, and an interpunct would start the list: "I want you to · feed, clothe, hé shelter these people."
This sentence is structurally "I want you ((to feed these people) && (to walk my dog) && (to go to the store for a bag of milk)."
The commas here would be Lilitika semicolons, and the list would start with a semicolon as well: "I want you to; feed these people; walk my dog; khé go to the store for a bag of milk."
Hyphenation is found only very rarely in vocabulary. Its primary function is to mark new welded compound words with which the reader may not be familiar, such as in the (now-fossilized) verb stilla-dzafé.
Stress can be represented on Títina by two dots under the vowel, much like nasalization or iotacization.
For aesthetic reasons, Lilitika is often rendered using a more Latin or English transcription when paired with the Latin alphabet:
|tsh||ch or cc|
In addition, vowels may be reconfigured to give a more natural reading to whomever is doing the transcription; in particular, terminal /e/ is rewritten to "é" or "ë" to emphasize its weight to speakers of languages used to silent terminal vowels. Thus tshekíudzhekwíe, an unusual construction meaning "studier of beliefs" (e.g. an epistemologist, comparative theologian, cultural sophontologist, etc.) may thus be written checkiajequié for the convenience of an English speaker.
These spelling alterations tend to stick to certain words. In particular, loanwords from Glissia tend to retain elements of their ancestral Latin spelling when they are rendered in the Latin alphabet as Lilitic terms. They are not universal, however; in particular, lilitica does not appear outside of Lyrisclensian texts when referring to the language.
Traditional orthography for Lilitika, in either the Latin alphabet or Títina, does not mark stress. While there exists a stress mark for Títina (two under-dots), its use was non-standard. Around 300 IKY, Lyrisclensian philologists introduced a Greek-based alphabet for Lilitika which was better at representing stress. Due to the larger size of the Lilitic alphabet, Coptic letters were also recruited, sometimes with unusual mappings.
To repeat the example from above, tshekíudzhekwíe thus becomes τϣεκῑυδϫεκῦῐε.